Sunday, October 7, 2012

Top 10 Comic Book Movies


These films are what I consider to be the current high point of comic book films.  These are strictly an opinion, and only that.  Everyone is entitled to their own point of view.  I welcome you to, if you disagree, to comment below on what you think the best films are, and why.  But I only ask you to keep it clean.  I'm not swearing, so I please ask you not to.  Thanks.  Now, lets get to the list.
10. Blade

            Blade renewed interest in comic book movies.  Blade was good enough to open doors that allowed movies like X-Men and Spider-Man to be made.  Blade eased the pain and sorrow left in the wake of Batman and Robin.  Blade was just a damn good action/horror movie.  Wesley Snipes perfectly captured the character of the day walker, a vampire immune to sunlight, and who fights off the blood sucking hordes of his nocturnal cousins and created a character that fights to defend humanity but was still clearly separated from them in a very dark way.  I think he made Blade a very compelling character because you understood that he was a monster who was fighting monsters and he knew it.  He knew he would never be human and it probably bothered him quite a bit.  So, with all they got right on Blade, why is it so low on the list?  For one simple reason, it doesn’t fit that well with the comic book counterpart.  Blade in the comics was a constant failure.  He’s had multiple re-launches with solo titles and they always fail to grab attention.  Blade the movie did what Blade the comic book character never could, it made money.

 

9: Watchmen

            I am not an Alan Moore fan.  There, I said it, and I don’t care.  I think he’s the poster child of everything that’s wrong with an author.  He’s arrogant, he’s blatant, he’s self absorbed and he thinks he’s smarter than his readers.  I just don’t like him, not as a writer and frankly not as a person.  But I like the movies adapted from his work, which is ironic since he hates these same movies.  Alan Moore has never endorsed any movie based on his work complaining that they always deviate from his original intent and that the story was suppose to be blah blah blah…I hate to break it to Mr. Moore, but 1) a work of art means many things to many different people and you can’t tell people how to interpret your work and 2) You don’t own the rights to these works and since you want nothing to do with the production process you don’t get to complain about the finished product.  Well, okay, you do get to complain, but no one has to listen to you.  But what about Watchmen?  Well, Watchmen was a pretty good movie, in my opinion.  It had a lot of interesting character development, it took some pretty basic character concepts from comics and gave them a very dark turn.  I can even get past glowing blue penis to enjoy this movie.  The story starts off as a murder mystery that expands into a wider web intrigue and devastation on a global scale and is probably one of the best put together storylines I’ve seen in a long time.  I’m also glad to see they had a better finale than some weird squid mutant monster thing.

 

8: 300

            This…isn’t quite Sparta.  This is what Spartans thought Sparta was, but history tells a different story.  But if you wanted actual history, you wouldn’t be watching 300.  It’s a very stylized movie that actually pulls off the look of a very old painting come to life. It covers the story of the 300 Spartans led by king Leonidas as he marches against the armies of Xerxes in his bid to take Greece.  Now there are some weird visual elements in this film, things that will make you cringe, scratch your head, want to hurl, or all three, but again it’s a well put together movie and very enjoyable if you like heavy, stylized action flicks.

 

7: The Crow

            We’re talking strictly about the Brandon Lee film, not the sequels, and not the tie in television series.  This is only the self contained story of Eric Draven and his revenge from beyond the grave against those that murdered him and his girlfriend.  It’s a very touching love story, when you get to the bare bones of it.  This man was so compelled by this injustice that he actually returns from the grave to exact bloody vengeance against a gain of thugs.  Once his work against the gang is complete, he wants nothing more than to return to the grave and join his love, but the gang leader, an over lord of crime if you will, has his own revenge against Draven now, given how Draven pretty much wiped out most of his criminal empire.  What starts off as a very specific revenge story unfolds into a story about what we leave behind when we go, and the consequences of revenge.

 

6: The Punisher

            Speaking of the consequences of revenge, this Thomas Jane vehicle was, to me, just a flat out fantastic movie.  Did it have some flaws, yes it did, but considering what they managed to pull off on what was essentially a shoestring budget, they did a wonderful job.  Thomas Jane stars as FBI Agent Frank Castle whose family is murdered by John Travolta…I mean Howard Saint.  Travolta and Jane are picture perfect for their roles and they really bring out the subtle nuances of these two men who are in a war of revenge.  Castle discovers as his war against Saint’s empire unfolds that it reaches further than he ever imagined and that perhaps his destiny is forever set by his actions.  And, at the end of it all, it did something the comics never could; it made me interested in something that had the punisher attached to it.

 

5: Batman: The Dark Knight

            Its Batman verses the Joker, law against chaos put in the ultimate contest.  Christian Bale reprises his role as the Batman from Batman Begins.  At this point, Batman’s quest has gotten the attention of the entire criminal world.  The mobsters are scared stupid of Batman since nothing seems to limit him, not even international politics.  Thus enters the Joker, played by Heath Ledger.  I have to say, when I first heard that Heath Ledger would be playing the Joker, I had my misgivings, as I’m sure a lot of people did.  But I had to remember director Christopher Nolan was involved and he cares enough about his projects that he wouldn’t put an actor into a role unless he knew, he KNEW they could make it something special.  And he hit pay dirt. It really is a shame that this is Ledger’s final, completed film, but he gave an outstanding performance.  When I first saw a trailer that actually featured the Joker, you could not have convinced me that this was the same guy from 10 Things I Hate About You and A Knight’s Tale.  Ledger threw himself into this part and it really shows.  I really think they could have just used Aaron Eckhart’s Two-Face for another film, however I can see how they felt him appropriate for the story.  Batman is the ultimate in law and order, the Joker is the ultimate in chaos and mayhem.  Two-Face is both.  He is the balance and that may have gotten a little lost between a lot of other really powerful performances.  What keeps this movie at the mid-way point on this list is the fact that it’s not really paced that well.  Well, it’s paced alright, but it’s extremely fast.  You really have no time to breath, and that’s because the events taking place in the story are coming at the characters extremely fast and the audience feels that.  When I first saw the film, it was on DVD and my friends and I literally had to take an intermission halfway through just to breath.  That kind of pacing, while making for a good action setting, isn’t good for the performances themselves.  The subtle work of the actors risks getting lost in the mayhem, and that is a crime given that you had fantastic actors like Bale, Eckhart, Ledger, along with Gary Oldman and Michael Caine.  These actors never give a bad performance, even if they are saddled with bad movies, and unfortunately you don’t really have time to digest their work when it’s buried in the high stress concepts of the film.

 

4: Iron Man

            Really this is just Robert Downey Jr playing Robert Downey Jr.  Tony Stark is actually a really bland character in the comics and prior to the film was considered a B-list superhero.  Downey’s performance in the role breathed new life into the character and made him relevant.  One thing I absolutely love about the performance is the amount of character development involved.  In the film, Tony Stark starts off a jaded ass who knows he’s the smartest man on the planet.  By the middle of the film he’s got a mission in life, a goal, a personal quest to set right the wrongs his jaded ass-ness let happen.  He’s still an ass, but a lot less jaded.  By the end of the film, he’s still an ass but now he has purpose.  Stark remained essentially the same guy but with a new perspective on life which is really how it should happen with these kinds of characters.  A lot of times they try to force feed character development and you really have no sense of the emotional or existential journey the character made to get from where he was to where he is at the end of the film and that takes you out of the film.  Here we have a very soft change, you didn’t see him change completely, you just saw him get angry for the right reasons and you can see how this sudden shift in his outlook jars even him.

 

3: The Incredible Hulk

            They really did this one right.  One of my biggest problems with a lot of interpretations of the Hulk is that you don’t quite know which one you are looking at.  In the first attempt at the character in film you didn’t feel anything for the Hulk or for Banner.  Banner was just bland, as was a lot of things in that movie.  Edward Norton as Banner was something pretty impressive.  He showed the character’s personal struggles without force feeding you a lot of introspective exposition.  You didn’t need anyone to tell you what he was feeling, you just knew by the performance itself.  The chemistry between Norton’s Banner and Liv Tyler’s Betty Ross was a lot more believable as well and she turned in a fantastic performance as the love interest/fellow protagonist.  Plus there was a big monster throw down at the end of the film and the epic Hulk Smash moment.  Speaking of the not-so jolly green giant, when you compare this film to the previous one, this Hulk seems a lot more believable.  The other Hulk was a much brighter green and eventually they had him running around in the purple pants made so famous by the early comics.  This Hulk had a darker shade to him, both color and personality.  With the first edition of the Hulk, they played him too safely.  He didn’t kill but maybe one or two people and that was more of things the Hulk did caused their deaths.  In the first foray on screen in the bottle factory, you are pretty certain that the Hulk really killed those guys.  They didn’t tone down the amount of violence or the quality of violence the Hulk is capable of, they didn’t pull any punches.  When this Hulk swatted, punched, or kicked someone, you knew that if the target wasn’t super-human, he was dead, and with the skeletal consistency of a beanie-baby.

 

2: Iron Man 2

            I put this one higher on my list than the first Iron Man film because I felt this was the most logical and natural evolution for the character.  Again, there is some character development involved, but not so much that you loose the essence of who Tony Stark is.  Robert Downey Jr. gives a portrayal of a successful man’s downward spiral into alcohol and self loathing that is just so genuine that it reminds you that this actor understands his character in a way no one else would comprehend.  You see the character at his lowest low, and at his absolute very best.  There isn’t a bad performance anywhere near this movie and it maintains a good balance of comic book action and real world concepts that you don’t think of it so much as a “comic book” movie, but more of a “sci-fi action” film.  The concepts they present are probably the most believable when you compare them to other films such as Spider-Man or even the Incredible Hulk, because you can see this kind of technology working, and you can see a very human character dealing with some very human issues.

 

1: Superman 1 & 2

            Superman was my first comic book character.  He was my childhood hero and I still have a soft spot for the man of steel today, but as I was compiling this list, I had to look at the Superman films not through the eyes of nostalgic childhood affection but through the eyes of a discerning adult.  Superman 1 and 2 get ranked as number one for a variety of reasons.  Now some may wonder why I have them tied together, and I have it that way because they are essentially one very long movie.  Superman: The Movie starts us off on Krypton where Jor El is condemning General Zod and his ilk to a sentence in the Phantom Zone.  This is yanked right out of the comics and was done so well that it pretty much set the tone for these characters for the next thirty years.  The reason that this is important is that this is essentially sequel baiting done in the very beginning of the film.  Sequel baiting are loose plot threads and partially done scene that hint at where the next movie is going to go.  A lot of these sequel baits happen right before the closing credits, or as the more popular trend is now, during the closing credits or at the very end of said credits.  Superman gave you the sequel bait at the very beginning and you didn’t even know it was sequel baiting.  You have that infamous line “You will bow down to me Jor-El!  You, and one day, your heirs!”  Now if you are just watching this movie as a stand alone film that the scene just serve to show how concepts of justice are not only part of Superman’s mindset, but actually present throughout his entire life, even that brief stint on Krypton.  Jor El is explained with this scene and a few following it completely so that you get to know who he was and what kind of genetic background Kal El comes from.  When you watch Superman 2 right behind this one, which feels like it takes place a very short time after the events of Superman 1, you realize that this is foreshadowing Zod’s return and invasion of Earth, essentially linking the two movies from the very beginning of the first all the way to the end of the second.  This has to be one of the most successful set ups for a film series and give the feel that you aren’t watching one movie, then it’s sequel, but rather just one very long movie.

 

On top of that the cast was just about picture perfect.  I still have some issues with Margot Kidder as Lois Lane, but I’ve pretty much put those issues to rest.  I don’t necessarily like her in the role, but I understand that at the time she was the best choice for the character.  I still would have preferred Lysette Anthony, but spit in one hand, wish in the other.  Reeve as Superman is unquestionably the best piece of casting that wouldn’t be duplicated until Robert Downey Jr. got a call back for Iron Man.  Across the board the casting and the portrayal of these characters was spot on from Terrance Stamp as Zod, Marlon Brando as Jor El, and Gene Hackman giving a chillingly comedic performance as Lex Luther.  One of the best villain moments I have ever seen has to bee in the third act of Superman 1 when Superman is confront Lex Luther and we get the following exchange:

 
Superman: Is that how you get your kicks, Luther?  By planning the deaths of millions of innocent people?

 
Lex: No.  By causing the death of millions of innocent people.

 
Hackman delivers that line with such a dead pan, matter of fact tone that you can’t help but look past all the comedic antics up to this point and realize he is one evil bastard.


Now, I love Iron Man to death, at least in films, but I can’t sit there and watch them with my son.  He’s too young to be exposed to many of the adult themes offered in the films, but I can sit with him and watch Superman 1 and 2.  It’s a film that engages both the children and the adults and is enjoyable no matter what era you are watching it in.

No comments:

Post a Comment