Released in 2011, Thor has met with
probably the greatest divide among fans of both the Marvel Comics character and
films. First, we should probably look
into a little bit of background for the character himself. Created by comic book legend Stan Lee, Thor
is based on the Norse deity of the same name and served to bring “culture” to
the Marvel Universe. What caused Thor to
stand apart from the Marvel U proper is the epic nature of his tales, the fact
that they were portrayed on a much more “mythic” scale with an almost
Shakespearian quality to the storyline.
These were not so much about super heroes fighting super villains as
they were about the intricate and complex relationships between these massively
powerful beings. Stan Lee and writers
after that very much took the Norse mythology and implanted it as a whole into
the Marvel Universe. Asgard was very
much a real place in the comics, and the mythos was treated as if it were
actual history. Further, Thor was
treated more as a plot device in his early stories, as he was banished from
Asgard to Earth, but even then he was denied a physical form. Rather, when Dr. Daniel Blake discovered an
ancient walking stick and struck it on the ground, the stick would transform
into Mjolnir and Thor would appear to deal with whatever the threat of the day
was. The storyline focused more on
Thor’s redemptive journey in understanding the true weight of responsibility
and heroism, as well as Blake taking much more agency in his own life.
The film does not follow that story. In fact, there is a lot that has changed from
the comics to the film, probably more so than most other comic book
franchises. Here, Asgard is treated as
another world, not so much another dimension but more of another planet. The set design for this world is fantastic,
and you can feel very much immersed in this universe. Thor, portrayed by Chris Hemsworth, is almost
delightfully arrogant when we first meet him, proudly parading through the
great hall after some significant victory.
But it’s this pompous nature that his father Odin, portrayed by Anthony
Hopkins, finds greatly disappointing, especially since Thor is next in line for
the throne of Asgard. Odin dressed down
Thor for not understanding responsibility, and this is followed by the best
trickster scene I’ve seen so far in film.
Loki, Thor’s “brother” saddles up beside him and sympathizes with Thor
about his plight, and uses very calculated prodding to get Thor fired up to
lead an attack on Jotunheim, the home of Laufey and the ice giants who are the
sworn enemies of Asgard, under an uneasy truce, and propagators of an attempt
to steal a spoil of war, the Casket of Ancient Winters.
What follows is a brilliantly choreographed battle sequence
that showcases the special abilities of all involved, from the ice giants’
frost manipulation, to Thor’s hammer swinging, to Loki’s magical misdirection,
to the Warriors Three and Sif laying the smack down. Eventually, however, they get in over their
head and Odin has to come in for a save, which greatly damages the truce. As punishment for his arrogance and
belligerence, Odin banishes both Thor and Mjolnir to Earth, casting a spell on
the hammer stating that only one who is worthy may wield the power of Thor.
The film
alternates in settings between Asgard and New Mexico , where we meet Dr. Jane Foster,
her assistant Darcy Lewis, and their mentor Dr. Erik Selvig, and admittedly
conveniently placed person of Norwegian heritage. They run into Thor, literally, when trying to
uncover the mystery of a spatial disturbance, the wormhole that dumped Thor
there in the first place. When SHEILD
agent Paul Coulson takes control of Mjolnier’s resting place and all of
Foster’s data, Thor leads a charge into the SHEILD facility with the expressed
purpose of retrieving his hammer and with it his powers. When that fails, an emotionally distraught
and crippled Thor is taken into custody.
This is a scene that Hemsworth, I think, portrays beautifully. His Thor is clearly damaged and shut down by
these events, and he doesn’t have to explain that in dialog, he does it
entirely with facial cues and body posture.
Selvig frees Thor and our hero resigns himself to exile on earth and
begins a romance with Foster, built upon his understanding of “the nine realms”
and how they interconnect.
Meanwhile,
back at the ranch, Loki has discovered Odin adopted him after the war with the
ice giants ended, shortly before the strain of using up a lot of power causes
Odin to fall into the “odinsleep”, a regenerative cycle. Unfortunately, this particular odinsleep
seems far more serious that those of the past, causing confusion and panic
amongst the Asgardians, and giving Loki leave to take control of the
kingdom. The Warriors Three plus Sif
come to Earth intent to bring Thor back, but Loki heads them off at the past by
sending a Destroyer after them. Loki’s
plan is simple on paper. By cutting off
Thor, and initiating the destruction of Jotunheim, he plans to please his
father, proving himself to be the son and leader that Thor never could be.
He doesn’t
count on Thor sacrificing himself to save those he cares for, thus earning the
power of Thor. Powered up, Thor beats
the Destroyer and returns to Asgard with his friends, leaving Jane and the
Earth company behind. Thor confronts
Loki and ends up destroying the Bifrost
Bridge in order to safe
Jotunheim and stop Loki’s plan as Odin wakes up. Loki, now despondent that he went from king
to utter failure and only served to elevate Thor, falls into the void. Thor and Odin make amends while Jane and her
team search for a way to open a portal back to Asgard.
I won’t say this is the best movie ever, or even the best
comic book movie, but I think it’s better than most. The violence is mostly
fantasy based, the language isn’t bad, and the acting is pretty solid. Essentially, it’s a film I can watch with my
kids without feeling the need to leap across the couch to cover tender eyes and
ears. Thor is a good, clean, family film
that manages to tell an engaging story without having to result to
“raciness”. That’s not to say that it’s
perfect. The character of Darcy Lewis
was, for the most part, unnecessary, and Selvig wasn’t much better. They shoehorn the character Hawkeye, who
later plays a more significant role in the Avengers, but in Thor, he’s
relegated to “Hey! It’s Hawkeye!” and
then quickly forgotten.
Again, its important to note that A LOT has changed from the
comics to the films, and I can understand how that would upset a lot of the
long time fans. However, I don’t feel
this was done to the detriment of the character. Thor still feels like Thor, and they hit all
the right notes for an introduction movie.
Yes, Asgard went from a mythical plane for gods to roam to another
planet, but it makes sense in a way within the context of the Marvel
movie-verse. One thing I had to come to
terms with way back when X-Men came out was that the movies are not the comics,
and vice versa. If you are going to enjoy
them, you have to accept them on their terms and not try to shoehorn your own
preconceived notions about how you think the story should flow. I believe they did do the comic justice and
that you had very strong performances from all the cast. Thor felt like a Shakespearian play featuring
super powered beings, which is what the comic was, and since it was directed by
Shakespearian thespian Kenneth Branagh, I think it sits nicely as a very
enjoyable movie.
Now, about Darcy Lewis.
Why do I keep coming back to her?
Because I think she’s a very misunderstood trope in films. You have the character of Thor, an alien
(essentially) and he meets BOTH Darcy and Jane at the same time. Neither gives him a particularly warm
reception at first but he ends up developing a relationship with Jane. I think Darcy’s presence, and the presence of
most female sidekicks to female leads in films, is to show that there is chemistry
between the male lead and a female lead, not that they end up together simply
because they’re the only two in the film.
It very well could have turned into a Darcy/Thor romance, but it didn’t
because he connects with Jane more. I
think these sidekick characters are often discredited as useless kibble, but
there is an overall purpose for them.
Film reviewer “The Blockbuster Buster” from
thatguywiththeglasses.com, mentions in his “honest review” of the film that he
felt that Thor’s attitude change came too easy, that someone (like Darcy)
should have died in order to facilitate the change, show the need for personal
responsibility in Thor, having his reckless actions cause her untimely demise
at the hands of…probably the destroyer.
But why?
Why do we want sideline character to die just to prove the
situation is serious? The Destroyer was
there with the expressed purpose to kill Thor.
Thor has already developed a bond with the humans around him, and it’s
not like he doesn’t understand the concept of personal responsibility…it’s been
drilled into him by Odin since he was born, he just never exercised it prior to
coming to Earth. He’s already learned
that the man he was isn’t going to get him back his power. He’s already felt the devastating results of
Odin’s disfavor. He doesn’t need guilt
to push him forward. Even when he lashed
out at the ice giants at the beginning of the film, it was a response to the
threat they presented by burglarizing their vault. For that matter, prior to getting struck by
the Destroyer, he was already helping get people to safety, putting himself in
the line of fire to do so…the change was already made! Not every hero needs personal tragedy to push
them forward. Sure it makes for a
compelling read, but when everyone has that skeleton in the closet, it actually
looses it’s effectiveness in a narrative setting. Some people actually do the right thing,
because it’s the right thing to do, not just because “if I fail, people die.”
I suppose it all boils down to the fact that Thor is a film,
based on a comic book, with a toy line, that the whole family can enjoy. This isn’t Transformers 1, 2, and 3, where
the violence and sexual connotations can be a little overwhelming for a parent
trying to keep their young children away from that. You can just sit back and enjoy the fun of
the movie. Yes, it was a set up film for
the Avengers, more so than Captain America and Iron Man 2, but it was
still a good film and I personally highly recommend it.
No comments:
Post a Comment